rfhealthЗдравоохранение Российской ФедерацииHealth care of the Russian Federation0044-197X2412-0723Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman10.46563/0044-197X-2020-64-6-329-335rfhealth-234Research ArticleПРОБЛЕМЫ СОЦИАЛЬНО ЗНАЧИМЫХ ЗАБОЛЕВАНИЙPROBLEMS OF SOCIALLY SIGNIFICANT DISEASESСмысловая регуляция тревожных ожиданий в период пандемии COVID-19: конспирологические тенденцииSemantic regulation of anxiety expectations during the COVID-19 pandemic: conspiracy trendshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7507-327XЗахароваНаталья ВячеславовнаZakharovaNatalia V.

канд. мед. наук, врач-психиатр, и.о. руководителя лаб. фундаментальных методов исследования НКИЦ нейропсихиатрии «ГБУЗ ПКБ 1 ДЗМ», 117152, Москва.

e-mail: nataliza80@gmail.com

nataliza80@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-4995БонкалоТ. И.BonkaloTatyana I.noemail@neicon.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5380-4406БраввеЛ. В.BravveLidia V.noemail@neicon.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9012-4140КалаковА. М.KalakovAnvar M.noemail@neicon.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4334-1601СюняковТ. С.SyunyakovTimur S.noemail@neicon.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-5138КовальчукД. Ф.KovalchukDmitriy F.noemail@neicon.ruГБУЗ «Психиатрическая клиническая больница № 1 им. Н.А. Алексеева» Департамента здравоохранения города МосквыN.A. Alekseev Clinic No 1ГБУ «Научно-исследовательский институт организации здравоохранения и медицинского менеджмента Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы»Research Institute of Health Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare DepartmentГБУЗ «Психиатрическая клиническая больница № 1 им. Н.А. Алексеева» Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы; ФГБУ НУ «Научно-исследовательский институт фармакологии им. В.В. Закусова»N.A. Alekseev Clinic No 1; Zakusov Research Institute of PharmacologyООО «Газпром»Gazprom LLC202001012021646329335Copyright © Захарова Н.В., Бонкало Т.И., Бравве Л.В., Калаков А.М., Сюняков Т.С., Ковальчук Д.Ф., 20212021Захарова Н.В., Бонкало Т.И., Бравве Л.В., Калаков А.М., Сюняков Т.С., Ковальчук Д.Ф.Zakharova N.V., Bonkalo T.I., Bravve L.V., Kalakov A.M., Syunyakov T.S., Kovalchuk D.F.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.rfhealth.ru/jour/article/view/234Введение

Введение. Пандемия COVID-19 сопряжена с нарастанием тревоги и распространением разнообразных конспирологических суждений. Высказана гипотеза о том, что повышенный уровень тревоги выступает субстратом конспирологии по механизму смысловой регуляции негативных ожиданий.

Цель исследования

Цель исследования: изучение особенностей конспирологических тенденций в период пандемии COVID-19 в Москве.

Методы

Методы. Обследовано 320 человек, выбранных сплошным случайным образом из общей популяции жителей Москвы, опрошены на предмет согласия или несогласия с 8 утверждениями, касающимися конспирологической трактовки событий, в сопоставлении с уровнем тревоги/депрессии (с применением шкалы HADS).

Результаты

Результаты. Выделены три тенденции (COVID-конспирология, COVID-скептицизм, COVID-обскурантизм). Согласиться с той или иной конспирологической идеей оказались готовы 45,7% опрошенных. Обнаружено, что уровень тревоги у всех приверженцев конспирологии выше, чем в остальной части выборки. Выявлены различия в социодемографических характеристиках приверженцев разных конспирологических тенденций. Среди COVID-скептиков достоверно меньше учащихся и пенсионеров, а среди COVID-конспирологов ниже уровень полученного образования при нестабильном трудовом и семейном статусе, а COVID-обскурантизм свойственен в большей степени женщинам с высшим образованием.

Обсуждение

Обсуждение. Конспирологические тенденции являются универсальными для всех социальных групп на фоне повышенной тревожности населения Москвы в связи с пандемией COVID-19. Предполагается, что механизмом развития конспирологических тенденций может быть процесс рационализации повышенного уровня тревожности как защитной реакции во время кризиса.

Заключение

Заключение. Полученные результаты могут быть полезны при разработке психопрофилактических мероприятий в периоды глобальных кризисов.

Introduction

Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with the spread of conspiracy theories, which are heterogeneous in terms of the structure of their views. The hypothesis is that the substrate for the spread of conspiracy trend is an increased level of anxiety, reduced due to the paralogical (conspiracy) interpretation of events.

The purpose of this research was to study the prevalence of conspiracy trends during the preparation for the COVID-19 pandemic in Moscow (before the introduction of strict restrictive measures).

Methods

Methods: 320 people, randomly selected from the general population, were asked if they agree or disagree with 9 statements regarding the conspiracy interpretation of events, compared with the level of anxiety/depression (using the HADS scale). There are 3 trends (COVID-conspiracy, COVID-skepticism, COVID-obscurantism).

Results

Results: 45.7% of respondents were ready to agree with one or the other conspiracy idea. I The level of anxiety in all adherents of conspiracy theory was found to be higher than in the rest of the sample. Differences in sociodemographic characteristics of adherents of different conspiracy tendencies are revealed. Among COVID skeptics, there are significantly fewer students and pensioners, and among COVID conspiracy theorists, the level of education received is lower, with unstable labor and family status.

Discussion

Discussion. Conspiracy trends were universal for all social groups in the background of increased anxiety among the population of Moscow in preparation for the COVID-19 pandemic. It is suggested that the mechanism for the development of conspiracy tendencies may be the process of rationalization of an increased level of anxiety as a protective response during a crisis.

COVID-19конспирологиятенденцияпандемиятревожностьдепрессияCOVID-19conspiracy theorytrendpandemicanxietydepressionReferencesGoreis A., Voracek M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: field characteristics, measurement instruments, and associations with personality traits. Front. Psychol. 2019; 10: 205. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930Goreis A, Voracek M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits. Front Psychol. 2019;10:205. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930Darwin H., Neave N., Holmes J. Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2011; 50(8): 1289-93.Darwin H, Neave N, Holmes J. Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Pers Individ Dif. 2011; 50(8):1289-1293.van Prooijen J.W., van Lange P.A.M. Power, Politics, and Paranoia: Why People are Suspicious of their Leaders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565417van Prooijen J-W, van Lange PAM. Power, Politics, and Paranoia: Why People Are Suspicious of Their LeadersDarwin H., Neave N., Holmes J. Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2011; 50(8): 1289-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027Darwin H., Neave N., Holmes J. Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Pers. Individ. Dif. 50, 1289–1293 (2011).van Prooijen J.W., van Lange P.A.M. The social dimension of belief in conspiracy theories. In: Power, Politics, and Paranoia: Why People are Suspicious of their Leaders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014: 237-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139565417.017van Prooijen J-W, van Lange PAM, van Prooijen J-W. The social dimension of belief in conspiracy theories. Power, Politics, and Paranoia.:237-253. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139565417.017Imhoff R., Lamberty P. How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Toward a more fine-grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2018; 48(7): 909-26.Imhoff R, Lamberty P. How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Toward a more fine-grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2018;48(7):909-926.van Prooijen J.W., Douglas K.M. Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2018; 48(7): 897-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2530van Prooijen J-W, Douglas KM. Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2018;48(7):897-908.van Prooijen J.W. Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Mem. Stud. 2017; 10(3): 323.Jan-Willem van Prooijen KMD. Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies. 2017;10(3):323.Wood M.J. Propagating and debunking conspiracy theories on twitter during the 2015-2016 zika virus outbreak. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2018; 21(8): 485-90. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0669Wood MJ. Propagating and Debunking Conspiracy Theories on Twitter During the 2015-2016 Zika Virus Outbreak. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018;21(8):485-490.Lewandowsky S., Stritzke W.G.K., Freund A.M., Oberauer K., Krueger J.I. Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict: from Iraq and the “War on Terror” to future threats to peace. Am. Psychol. 2013; 68(7): 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034515Lewandowsky S, Stritzke WGK, Freund AM, Oberauer K, Krueger JI. Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict: from Iraq and the “War on Terror” to future threats to peace. Am Psychol. 2013;68(7):487-501.Lewandowsky S., Gignac G.E., Oberauer K. The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10): e75637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075637Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Oberauer K. The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e75637.Sharma M., Yadav K., Yadav N., Ferdinand K.C. Zika virus pandemic-analysis of Facebook as a social media health information platform. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2017; 45(3): 301-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.022Sharma M, Yadav K, Yadav N, Ferdinand KC. Zika virus pandemic-analysis of Facebook as a social media health information platform. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45(3):301-302.March E., Springer J. Belief in conspiracy theories: The predictive role of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy. PLoS One. 2019; 14(12): e0225964. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225964March E, Springer J. Belief in conspiracy theories: The predictive role of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225964.Jolley D., Douglas K.M. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2): e89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177Jolley D, Douglas KM. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89177.Imhoff R., Bruder M. Speaking (un-)truth to power: conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. Eur. J. Pers. 2014; 28(1): 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930Imhoff R, Bruder M. Speaking (Un-)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as a Generalised Political Attitude. European Journal of Personality. 2014;28(1):25-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930van Prooijen J.W., van Dijk E. When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2014; 55: 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.006van Prooijen J-W, van Dijk E. When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014;55:63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.006Wang C., Pan R., Wan X., Tan Y., Xu L., Ho C.S., et al. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020; 17(5): 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, et al. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729Azim D., Kumar S., Nasim S., Arif T.B., Nanjiani D. COVID-19 as a psychological contagion: A new Pandora’s box to close? Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2020; 41(8): 989-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.127Azim D, Kumar S, Nasim S, Arif TB, Nanjiani D. COVID-19 as a psychological contagion: A new Pandora’s box to close? Infection Control; Hospital Epidemiology. 2020:1-2. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.127Grzesiak-Feldman M. The effect of high-anxiety situations on conspiracy thinking. Curr. Psychol. 2013; 32(1): 100-8.Grzesiak-Feldman M. The Effect of High-Anxiety Situations on Conspiracy Thinking. Curr Psychol. 2013;32(1):100-118.van Prooijen J.W., van Vugt M. Conspiracy theories: evolved functions and psychological mechanisms. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2018; 13(6): 770-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618774270van Prooijen J-W, van Vugt M. Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018;13(6):770-788.Выготский Л.С. Психология развития человека. М.: Смысл-Эксмо; 2005.Vygotskiy L.S. Psychology of Human Development [Psikhologiya razvitiya cheloveka]. Moscow: Smysl-Eksmo; 2005. (in Russian)Костюк Г.П., Масякин А.В., Бурыгина Л.А., Реверчук И.В. Проблема диагностики и лечения депрессии врачами первичного звена. Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. 2019; 119(1S): 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00867-0Kostyuk G.P., Masyakin A.V., Burygina L.A., Reverchuk I.V. The problem of the diagnosis and treatment of depression by primary care physicians. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2019; 119(1S): 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00867-0

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.